Archives for posts with tag: feminist bullshit

Don’t get me wrong. I love a lot of the concise, reference-supported articles I find on RationalWiki, especially when it concerns pseudoscience such as the HHO/water-powered car. It’s a handy shortcut to refuting ridiculous things that aren’t scientifically accurate, and nothing makes me feel much more joy than when a bunch of Internet conspiracy theorists are told that they’re wrong and it really rustles their jimmies.Sadly, rational thought and scientifically backed information dissemination are thrown out the window with a ferocity when you start looking up anything that touches the feminist agenda. Look up “feminism” on RationalWiki and you’ll immediately find weaselly, highly subjective statements that lean squarely in the favor of a radical feminist’s perverted perception of reality.  For example, the section entitled “Academic Criticism” begins the heading “Seeing rape everywhere” with these two sentences: “Feminists have in the past, and continue in the present to emphasize the importance of addressing modern rape culture. Something no one but the most aggressive MRA types think is a bad goal.” For one thing, there is no such thing as “rape culture,” as seen by the fact that I can drive for four hours and not only see no one being raped, but not even be exposed to anything that comes remotely close to mentioning rape….that is, unless we’re re-defining “rape” as feminists are constantly attempting to re-define it, where it effectively becomes “being a male near a female,” at which point the term “rape” would become irrelevant to most people and lose all of its power and importance. The other thing that’s quite ridiculous is the notion that “the most aggressive men’s rights activists think stopping (implied rape) is a bad idea” along with all of the notably absent supporting references attached to it. Hmm…But wait! Let’s not jump to conclusions based solely on the fact that no substantive criticism of feminism exists in a criticism section of a feminism article on a “rational wiki!” Let’s see if the same treatment is given to articles that cover opposing viewpoints! Aha…we’ll look at the text for misandry, the antonym for the oft-used and heavily abused term “misogyny.” Uh-oh…it doesn’t look good at all, since there’s an entire SECTION of the article entitled “Concise explanation of why the concept is bullshit.” Let’s see what’s under this damning title…oh, here we are: “Sexism, like racism, is an institutional oppression on basis of sex.”No, sexism isn’t institutional oppression on basis of sex; in fact, there’s nothing “institutional” about it. Wikipedia and Merriam-Webster agree: “sexism is prejudice or discrimination based on a person’s sex.” I don’t see anything institutional about that definition; do you? “Oh, but you’re ignoring OTHER DEFINITIONS!” the clever feminist might bleat, to which I respond with the other definition: “behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex.” Wait, that doesn’t support “institutional oppression” either, does it? D’awwww, call in the waaambulance because the astute feminist needs to fill out an Internet butthurt report form to squelch the horrible feeling of one’s religion being proven wrong in yet another increment.

via RationalWiki universally pushes radical feminist dogma, which isn’t “rational” at all.


Poor western white women how terrible it must be to educated and overly valued

White women throughout the world and online are apparently championing their fight for civil rights. Sounds silly right, well its beyond silly its fucking hysterical! Really though how many people have seen white women every truly oppressed? When white women marched and set fire to things in the UK back in the early 1900s it was their husbands and fathers that took the blame for them it was very rare for a suffragette to even get arrested. Only a few of the more violent women were arrested. This arrest however was far from anything a man would face. Oddly even if these women admit their privilege don’t expect them to make it something objective so much as victimizing of themselves. Yes I am calling “patriarchy” a conspiracy theory. I mean really it is, you have the three needed pillars of a conspiracy. It divides the good and the bad clearly and makes the good guys the under dog. In this case feminists label themselves the under dog despite their the dominant social ideologies of our time, they receives millions (directly and indirectly) of dollars in government funding and has more lobbying power than any other social movement including the President of the United State Barrack Obama. The two others are rather obvious the skin deep patriarchy is generally accepted as the Us president is a man, but no meaningful evidence of a global male conspiracy oppressing women exists! Finally Latour’s assertion that a “conspiracy theory” is largely derived from Marxist inspired theory. Oddly almost all feminist thoughts and actions are inspired directly from Marxism and Anarchism. So if the Patriarchy was real in the feminist mentioned ways then why is it women, and in result feminists turn out to be the numerical majority of all things good. Women live longer have more medical research and treatment option then men and despite controlling 88% America’s 1% they only pay a fraction of the taxes men pay and only work in the white collar world largely because the opertunities in American are largely reserved for women, most often white women of Feminism.

The Core

Lets understand the beginning yes the very beginning of whiny white women is the very beginning of feminism. It started with Suffrage, and I don’t seen any black or Hispanic women. Don’t believe what I am saying, well here we are several images all about the Suffrage movement. Look at the white women in white marching, such brave strong women, yeah no more like privileged rich women with nothing to do. I mean literally throughout nations like Africa, South America and across Native American cultures Patriarchy did exist, but that never meant women had no poweror choice as most feminist declare. For feminism destroying the Patriarchy is their single unifying lynch pin, even if it is nothing more than a myth at best and more often a bogus Conspiracy theory as I have already mentioned.

Where the non white women were

The life of women in Africa was more matrilineal, they contributed to the economy in equal numbers as the men. While hunting was a mainstay for meat it was not the main food, men would often fish farm and even do so with the help of their wives and daughters. This of course was long before the Dutch and British slavers. Hell Native American women worked side by side with the men while the tribes were over all run by men it was heavily influenced by women. When white settlers appeared in the New World the fact women were working is what made the Native Americans appear to be savages. After all they had created a system to pamper their women as ladies or consumers of products.

In the New world the British established a heavy reliance on slavery. So a man in Africa would soon be no more than a pack animal. He couldn’t marry or keep his family together nor could he prevent or exact justice when his wife and daughter were raped. In the mean time the master’s wife and or daughters would sit around fanning themselves and playing dress up with their slaves. So in the end they really had very few issues about having their sexuality oppressed or abused.

With the people we now call Hispanic they lived in a Patriarchy although their power in society was not like a stay at home mom they had to prove their ethics and their value of their to a man. They were never allowed to go from pampered daughters to pampered wives. They proved their skills as farmers or at handling game and medical practices of the tribe. While men went through their passages of manhood the girls had to study and learn trades to become a woman worthy of marriage and a valuable tribe member.

Now it must also be noted, lest you think this is strictly a white vs. non-white dynamic. I’m trying to establish. Its not, Eastern European white women of today can’t adopt the western feminist narrative either because communism also saw them “liberated” from traditional gender roles. This is far from true unless you mean only from gender roles, and not actual freedom. So when western white women were whining about patriarchy the women of the East were probably to busy working. It was this very fact that they and other women (native american, Hispanic and African Americans) would not see traditional gender roles as something not so oppressive or harmful.

Now for the women I just mentioned the way a white woman lived in the 1950s and 1960s was something very rare for a black man to be able to provide. In fact not many white women even cared for their own homes or children.

In the south and across America the wealthy white women who made second wave feminism often paid black women to raise their children, clean the home their husband paid for, and cook the food for the husband and his wife. I honestly wonder how many of the black women that served these women could ever adopt feminism? The feminists were treating them just barely better than a slave cutting their pay if they used the toilets they kept clean. How could these women buy into Patriarchy if the men they saw were coming home every day to a woman that couldn’t even be bothered to cook him dinner? The man’s wife pays no attention to his child or home. From the place of a white woman and from the black woman is it any wonder why feminist or racial animosity between the two is more tense than white men and black men? The White Generation Y men grew up the Children of the lazy entitled feminist women, and the minorities grew up watching these spoiled white women whine about women’s rights so long as the woman was white and well off of course. So now we are in the generation of Attachment parenting.

The List of White women

Andrea Dworkin

Valerie Solanas

Robin Morgan

Susan Brownmiller

Sally Miller Gearhart

Catherine Comins

Jessica Vallenti

Germaine Gree

Clarie Sargent

Faith Whittlesy

The entire writing staff of Jezzeble

Shirley Chisholm

Anita Sarkeesian

Well that’s as many feminist I can list and yes they are all western gender feminists. As for Feminism as we know it today, is a middle/upper-class white, western female supremacist group with many members dedicated to killing all the men or at the very least making us into less than human. Feminists focus their energy on minimizing the value of traditional gender roles and on the promotion of unrealistic gender superiority of the poor opressed white women. The fact their cause was founded on the status those women elite women that enjoyed, and continue to enjoy living the most well-protected, pampered, adored, and privileged life, and it is designed largely to inflict serve problems upon to those who serve them.